The Epson EcoTank Wireless ET-4850 all-in one printer is a top-of the line letter-and legal-size printer. It’s intend for home and small offices. The ET-4850 is nearly identical in size, features and performance to the Editors’ Choice-winning Brother MPFC-J4335DW. However, the Brother uses cartridges while the ET-4850 uses low-cost ink. The Brother printer is better if printer price you don’t print often, but the ET-4850 is a great bargain if you do. This makes it our Editors’ Choice for heavy duty personal and home-office printing.

All the Features That You Will Probably Need

The ET-4850, like most AIOs can print, scan, and work as a standalone copier or fax machine. The ET-4850 fax driver allows you to send faxes directly from your computer. Epson ScanSmart allows you to scan to Evernote, save it as a file and attach it to an email.

The paper handling system for printing is ideal for personal and small-office use. It has a 250-sheet drawer as well as support for automatic duplexing (duplexing) and supports for double-sided printing. Epson recommends a monthly duty cycle of 800 pages or 40 pages per day, which is realistic considering the printing capacity. There is no single-sheet bypass tray. You will need to place the paper drawer in order to print letterhead and other special-purpose papers occasionally. The Brother MFC-J4335DW, on the other hand, has a smaller capacity but offers the convenience of a bypass tray.

The price is quite high for paper handling, including copying and faxing. The ADF can also handle legal-size paper and is able to accommodate a 30-page document. The ADF doesn’t scan both sides of a page and does not support manual duplexing. This would allow you to flip the stack and scan the second side. You can also interfile the pages automatically in the correct order by turning the stack upside down. This won’t affect everyone but it can make the printer less affordable if you have to scan or copy multiple-sided documents.

It’s Small Enough to Share Your Desk

The ET-4850 comes in white or black and can be placed on your desk easily. The ET-4850 is 14.8 lbs and measures 10.0 x 16.4 x 19.8 inches (HWD), with printer price the ADF and output tray fully extended.

There are four options for connecting: Ethernet, Wi Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Direct, Ethernet and Ethernet. Ethernet was use for my performance tests. Epson’s Smart Panel app allows you to print from and scan to mobile devices for Android or iOS printing. It also lets you set up and monitor your printer. The ET-4850, as with most Epson printers, supports Epson Email Print, and Epson Remote Print, which allow you to send files directly to the printer over the internet.

The well-designed installation utility makes it easy to install the product. Epson provides a disc to check for the latest software online. You can also visit Epson’s website and download drivers and apps.

The installation requires you to manually align the samples. This is a problem because it can be difficult to spot small differences between print samples. You could do this automatically by placing the sample on the scanner bed.

Sufficient Speed, Excellent Quality

Although the ET-4850’s performance ratings for monochrome black pages are not impressive at 15.5ppm and color pages at 8.5ppm respectively, it still deliver respectable performance when compare to similarly priced inkjet printers and other cartridge printers.

My tests with our standard testbed showed that the ET-4850 was able to produce monochrome text at 13.8ppm (52 secs) using our 12-page Word file. The first page included. It took 7.5 minutes and 20 seconds to complete our business applications printer price suite. This includes color output. It took 1 minute and 25 seconds for 4-by-6 inch photos using Epson Premium Photo Paper Glossy.

The ET-4850 is now tied with the Brother MFC-J4335DW (a cartridge-based model that prints black text at 14.7ppm, or 49 seconds), Both are slower than the Epson WorkForce ProWF-7840 or WF-7820 cartridge-base printers that can print super-sized text and cost less than the ET-4850, but both are still noticeably slower than either. They were virtually tied at 20ppm (24 seconds)

The ET-4850 was faster than any cartridge-based AIOs in our business applications suite. Both the WF-7820 & WF-7840 were clock at 12 ppm (2 min 5 seconds), and the MFC–J4335DW was clocked at 10.5ppm (2 min 23 seconds).

How We Test Printers

The quality of text and graphics was not up to the standard for business inkjets. The edges of characters were not as crisp as laser-printer crispness. However, all fonts tested that could be used in business documents were easily readable at 5 point, with the exception of one italic font, which was easily readable at 6 point. Loops and spaces between characters in one of our highly stylized fonts made it difficult to read even 10-point text. An identical font, but at 8 points was easy to read.

The default settings caused subtle banding in graphics. However, colors were well saturate and lines were thin enough to hold up. The recommended paper was of low quality. On a black-and white photo, I noticed a noticeable blue-green shift.

Our smudging tests consist of placing a few drops on output printed less than 24 hours before and wiping it off. Both black and color inks did a printer price great job of resisting smudging on both plain and recommended photo paper. I did see water spots on a color graphic that I had left to dry.

A seriously low cost per page

The ET-4850’s refillable tanks make it very affordable to ink. It costs 0.3 cent per page for a standard black paper and 0.9 cent for color. Comparing the Brother MFCJ4335DW to the ET-4850, this is a savings of 0.6c per black page and 3.6 cents per colour page. That’s $6 per 1000 text pages, and $36 per 1,000 color pages. Remember that the final cost of ownership is the sum of the initial price and the ongoing cost of printing the pages. To determine which printer is actually cheaper, you will need to do the math.

The Editors’ Choice winner MFC-J4335DW is a low-cost option if you don’t plan to print enough pages to make ink cost a concern. If you prefer speed and flexible paper handling, the Epson WF7820 has two paper tray options, or the WF-7840 has three. Each can handle supertabloid-size papers, and both have extra paper trays that allow you to load multiple types of paper at once.

Home offices that print a lot need AIO features. This is the niche for the ET-4850. The features are comparable to the MFCJ4335DW, and with printer price enough use it will offer lower total costs of ownership. This combination is why it deserves an Editors’ choice award.

HP (also known as Hewlett-Packard) is a brand of home electronics that focuses on printers and other computer-related products. There are many printers available, including inkjet, laser, color and monochrome, all-in-one, printer-only, and all-in one. Although their range can seem overwhelming, you can choose from several lineups that will best suit your needs.

Each line-up has its own pros and cons, which are more in line with the intended use. They also come at a variety of price points so that you can find the printer that suits your needs.

Note We are currently updating our printers to the latest 1.0 test bench. Some scores might change. This article will be updated as soon as we have retested the printers. The changes to our method can be viewed here.

The Best HP Printers

We have tested the HP Color LaserJet PromFP M479fdw as the best HP printer for home offices. Although it is a laser printer that prints only monochrome, it can also print in color. You won’t need to change the toner cartridge often because it has excellent page yields both for black-only and colored documents. Even if you print often, the cost per print remains low. It’s a laser printer so it prints at speeds much faster than HP inkjets. This means you don’t need to wait to print a batch of receipts or invoices. The printer has a flatbed scanner with high resolution and an automatic document feeder capable of duplex scanning. These are great features for digitizing multi-page reports or double-sided documents quickly. You have two options for connectivity: you can either use the printer wirelessly via Wi-Fi or the mobile app. Or, you can connect it to a wired network using an Ethernet port. There’s also a USB port that allows you to print directly from thumb drives.

The laser technology is not suitable for photo printing. Images are often blurred and pixelated. The colors are also dull. This printer, like many other HP printers does not support Bluetooth printing. However, it supports Apple AirPrint and Mopria Print Service, which allow you to print wirelessly using a smartphone or tablet. It’s an excellent choice if you are looking for an HP printer to use in your small business or home office.

BEST HP PRINTER TO PRINT PHOTOS

The HP ENVY Photo 78555 is our top-rated photo printer. The all-in-one printer prints high-quality photos in under one minute. This means you don’t need to wait for mementos. The photos are rich in color and contrast. Grayscale photos look great. The flatbed scanner is a high-resolution feature that allows you to digitize old photos printers and documents with excellent clarity. There are many connectivity options available, including Bluetooth compatibility and Ethernet ports. You can also print directly from them using USB keys and SD cards. This is great for digital cameras that use a digital camera. It has a lower page yield than other options but it uses relatively cheap ink cartridges. This means that the cost per print remains affordable even if you need to replace them more often.

The photos are bright and vibrant with great detail. However, the color accuracy is poor so this product is not recommended if you need to reproduce exact colors for professional graphic design projects. The build quality is poor and the tray is difficult to remove. Its touchscreen display isn’t sensitive so it can be difficult to navigate through the menu. It’s an excellent choice for casual photo printing.

oppo-reno-2-review has a lot of phones in the Reno line, which can be confusing. We’re actually reviewing the Reno 2 here. It is a step down on the Reno 10x Zoom that we reviewed earlier in this year. Reno 10x Zoom was a powerful handset that featured high-end hardware. The Reno 2 is more midrange. The Reno 2 is not available in the US. However, the UK price of PS449 works out at around $575. You can also get more bang for your buck by purchasing the $479 Google Pixel 3aXL.

Design, Display and Durability

The Reno 2 measures 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches (HWD), and weighs 6.67 ounces. It is available in black, blue, and pink. It’s lightweight enough to be use for long periods of time, but the glossy finish and curved back panel make it feel fragile and easy drop.

A 6.5-inch display is feature on the front, with almost no bezels thanks to a pop up selfie camera. The back features a curved glass panel with a discrete vertical camera housing four sensors. The Oppo logo is display below the cameras on a long oval stripe. It reflects light and carries the Oppo logo. On the top, you will find the hidden selfie camera. At the bottom, speakers, a USB port and a headphone socket. On the right side, you’ll find a hybrid SIM/microSD slot as well as a power button. It is easy to reach and makes a satisfying click when it is press. The left side houses volume rockers.

The phone’s AMOLED 6.5-inch display is stunning. It has a resolution of 2,400 x 1,080 and a crisp 401 pixels per in. The phone’s color accuracy is excellent, with vivid primary colors and inky blacks that seem to pop off the screen. The only problem with the display is its inability to be seen in direct sunlight.

The Reno 2 is almost entirely made of glass so durability is an issue. It is Gorilla Glass 6, so it should be able handle minor drops. It doesn’t have an IP rating so it shouldn’t be dropp in water. For your peace of mind, we recommend that you put your phone in a case.

Hardware and Benchmarks

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 chipset powers the phone. It also has 8GB RAM and 128GB or 2256GB storage. Each storage model has a microSD slot, which can hold an additional 256GB.

How We Test Phones

The Reno 2’s processor is more powerful than the Snapdragon 670 found in the Pixel 3a XL. However, the Reno 2’s performance is very similar. The Reno 2 was able to handle multitasking and processing-intensive apps such as Adobe Premiere Rush easily during our testing. Asphalt 8 was play for more than an hour without lag and skipped frames.

Geekbench 5 was use to test the phone. This suite of benchmarks evaluates performance by imitating apps as well as machine learning and Augmented Reality. The Reno 2 scored 550 on single-core performance, and 1,774 on multi-core. This gives it a slight advantage over the Pixel 3a (503) but not the Pixel 3a (1,824). However, this is almost impossible to notice in real-world usage.

The Reno 2’s 4,000mAh battery was able to last 10 hours and 17 mins in our battery drain test. This is when HD media is stream over Wi-Fi at maximum brightness. We were able to charge the phone every other night with more conservative usage. It also comes with a 20W adapter for charging if you run out. Wireless charging is not available.

Network and audio quality

The Reno 2 supports bands 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/18/20/26/28/32/38/39/40/41. oppo-reno-2-review Although it should work on AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile in theory, coverage is limit and unpredictable due to the absence of mid-band coverage. oppo-reno-2-review the phone was tested on AT&T’s network, which is located in Manhattan. We were able to access 3G, but only at 2.75Mbps down, and 0.72Mbps upwards.

The Pixel 3a XL’s call quality is worse than the Pixel 3a XL. In our testing, calls sounded robotic with noise reduction intermittently cutting off the end of words. Background noise could also sneak in from time-to-time.

The peak earpiece volume was measure at 70dB. Speakerphone volume reached 72dB, while multimedia volume reached 90dB. The speaker is very crisp and clean.

Reno 2 supports dual band Wi-Fi as well as Bluetooth® 5.0 for audio/wearable connectivity. NFC is available for mobile payments.

Cameras

The Reno 2 features four cameras sensors at the back, as mentioned. 48MP is the primary lens. It has an f/1.7 aperture, optical image stabilization, and a 48MP size. A 13MP telephoto lens has an f/2.4 aperture and optical image stabilization, as well as an 8MP ultra-wide lens having an f/2.2 aperture and a 2MP black/white sensor with an aperture of f/2.4.

Software support is available for a 5x hybrid zoom. This takes advantage of all the focal lengths and allows you to capture the best shots. To improve low-light shots, an ultra-dark mode as well as AI noise detection are available.

The camera was test in various lighting conditions. We were able to get crisp images, great depth of field and good portrait mode in all scenarios. Both the ultra-wide lens and the telephoto lens produced similar results. However, we did find that the telephoto lens had some noise in low-light tests.

16MP front-facing camera with f/2.0 aperture. It is hidden behind the display and pops up when you tap on the lens switch button within the camera app. oppo-reno-2-review it was test under the same conditions that the rear camera, and we were very happy with the results. Normal lighting made the shots look sharp without any blurring. We found a slight blurring of the images when viewing them in large size. Portrait mode worked flawlessly.

Software

Oppo’s ColorOSUI UI is included with the Reno 2. Oppo’s ColorOS UI has been refined over the years. However, it feels unwieldy when switching screens or using the Smart Assistant feature. Smart Assistant is Oppo’s alternative to Google Feed. It lacks useful widgets and doesn’t recognize your usage patterns. You can also find a few redundant apps that are meant to replace Google’s suite in the Google folder.

These apps are just a few of the many third-party apps that litter Reno 2. They can be removed, which is a good thing as you won’t be bombarded with notifications and requests for data. These apps, which are most likely leftovers from Oppo’s largest market China–where Google’s apps are banned–are almost all unnecessary. You won’t get multi-year OS updates as you do with Pixels and phones that have Android One.

Conclusions

Although the Oppo Reno 2 is a solid mid-range phone, it has poor camera performance and is not particularly attractive. It is not recommended for US use. However, even if it is, Oppo phones are much more easily available (and compatible) in other markets. The Reno 10x Zoom by the company offers a faster processor and a lower price. We recommend the Pixel 3a XL for US buyers. It offers a superior experience and costs just $100 more, making it our Editors’ choice.